logo
Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd.
About Us
Your Professional & Reliable Partner.
Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd,is a professional metal mine beneficiation solution provider, with world-leading solutions for refractory beneficiation. Over the years, we have accumulated rich successful experience in the fields of copper, molybdenum, gold, silver, lead, zinc, nickel, magnesium, scheelite and other metal mines, rare metal mines such as cobalt, palladium, bismuth and other non-metal mines such as fluorite and phosphorus. And can provide customized beneficiation solutions ...
Learn More

0

Year Established

0

Million+
Employees

0

Million+
Annual Sales
China Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. HIGH QUALITY
Trust Seal, Credit Check, RoSH and Supplier Capability Assessment. company has strictly quality control system and professional test lab.
China Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. DEVELOPMENT
Internal professional design team and advanced machinery workshop. We can cooperate to develop the products you need.
China Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. MANUFACTURING
Advanced automatic machines, strictly process control system. We can manufacture all the Electrical terminals beyond your demand.
China Y&X Beijing Technology Co., Ltd. 100% SERVICE
Bulk and customized small packaging, FOB, CIF, DDU and DDP. Let us help you find the best solution for all your concerns.

Quality Flotation Reagents & Froth Flotation Reagents Manufacturer

Find Products That Better Meet Your Requirements.
Cases & News
The Latest Hot Spots
How can new environmentally friendly inhibitors solve the complex separation challenges of lead-zinc ores?
In the flotation tank, foam is churning, and a green reagent is quietly changing the rules of the game for lead-zinc separation. In traditional ore processing plants, the pungent smell of sodium sulfide permeates the flotation workshop, high doses of lime cause severe scaling in the pipes, and the cost of wastewater treatment remains high. These conventional inhibitors often prove ineffective when dealing with complex lead-zinc ores. Difficult-to-process oxidized lead-zinc ores, mixed lead-zinc sulfide ores, and ores containing carbonaceous or argillaceous gangue, where lead and zinc minerals have similar floatability, are difficult to separate efficiently using conventional reagents. This leads to excessive zinc content in the lead concentrate and enrichment of lead impurities in the zinc concentrate, resulting in persistently low recovery rates. With increasing environmental pressure, some traditional inhibitors face the risk of being banned due to their toxicity or non-biodegradability.  Seeking efficient, low-toxicity, and easily biodegradable new inhibitors has become an urgent task for the industry. 01 Separation Dilemma: Why do traditional inhibitors fail in the face of complex ore bodies? Traditional inhibitors such as cyanide and dichromate, although somewhat effective, are highly toxic and pose a high risk of environmental pollution, and their use has been gradually restricted. Even the relatively environmentally friendly lime-sodium sulfide combination has problems such as high dosage, narrow applicability, and severe inhibition of associated precious metals. For complex lead-zinc ores with high sulfur, high iron, high oxidation rates, or containing carbonaceous or argillaceous "interfering components," traditional methods often experience a dramatic drop in separation efficiency. Lead-zinc inter-contamination indicators worsen, concentrate product quality degrades, directly affecting sales prices. In one mining area, the lead content in the zinc concentrate reached 1.2% when using conventional inhibitors, far exceeding the contractual limit of 0.8%, resulting in the rejection of the entire batch of products and significant economic losses. Environmental regulations are becoming increasingly stringent, and some mines face fines or even production shutdowns due to excessive heavy metals or toxic substance residues in their wastewater. Environmental compliance costs have become a significant component of ore processing costs. 02 Mechanism of Action: How do environmentally friendly inhibitors achieve selective inhibition? New environmentally friendly inhibitors mainly refer to organic polymer inhibitors and combined conditioning agents. Their mechanism of action differs from the traditional "blocking" type of inhibition, and is more selective. These reagents are designed at the molecular level to induce specific adsorption of their functional groups onto the surface of zinc minerals or gangue minerals, altering their hydrophilicity while minimizing the impact on the floatability of lead minerals. For example, certain modified starches or cellulose derivatives show significant inhibitory effects on sphalerite but weaker inhibition on pyrite. Environmental characteristics are reflected at both the source and the end: synthetic raw materials tend to be natural and renewable (such as plant extracts), and the molecular structure is easily biodegradable in the natural environment. Industrial trials have shown that the theoretical dosage of some new reagents can be reduced by 30%-50% compared to traditional inhibitors, and they are non-toxic and harmless. In tests conducted by Tianzhou Group on a carbonaceous argillaceous lead-zinc ore, it was found that using a specific combination of environmentally friendly inhibitors not only improved lead-zinc separation efficiency, but also increased the recovery rate of trace associated silver, which was previously severely inhibited, by approximately 15%, achieving dual optimization of both main metals and associated precious metals. 03Industrial Verification: From Laboratory Data to Stable Production Indicators A large lead-zinc mine in Southwest China had an ore with a zinc oxidation rate exceeding 30% and containing a large amount of easily sludged chlorite. The original process used a large amount of lime and sodium sulfide, resulting in a zinc recovery rate of less than 75%, and the high pH of the recycled water made it difficult to reuse. After introducing a new environmentally friendly scheme mainly based on sodium humate and a polysaccharide inhibitor, and following continuous laboratory flotation tests and three months of industrial commissioning, the final stable indicators showed: zinc concentrate grade increased from 48% to 51%, recovery rate jumped from 75% to 82%, and the loss rate of zinc in lead concentrate decreased by 2.1 percentage points. The reagent cost per ton of raw ore increased by approximately 0.8 yuan, but the benefits from increased recovery rate and improved concentrate quality resulted in a net profit increase of more than 5 yuan per ton of raw ore. The environmental benefits were even more significant, with wastewater treatment costs decreasing by approximately 40%, and achieving a closed-loop circulation of over 85% of the flotation wastewater. In practice at a high-sulfur lead-zinc mine in Xinjiang, the new inhibitor scheme successfully solved the problem of separating pyrite from sphalerite, ensuring that the sulfur content in the zinc concentrate met the standards, eliminating the need for subsequent desulfurization costs. Industrial data shows that the total consumption of collectors has therefore decreased by approximately 20%. 04Cost-Benefit Analysis: How Do Environmental Investments Translate into Net Profit? Evaluating the economics of novel inhibitors requires establishing a comprehensive cost model, encompassing multiple dimensions such as direct reagent costs, metal recovery benefits, product quality premiums, environmental compliance cost savings, and improved production stability. Directly comparing reagent unit prices can be misleading. In one case, the unit price of the new inhibitor was three times that of sodium sulfide, but due to its high efficiency and selectivity, the actual consumption was only 1/4 of the traditional reagent, resulting in a 10% reduction in the overall inhibitor cost per ton of ore. Improved metal recovery rates directly translate into revenue. Taking a processing plant with a daily capacity of 3000 tons of ore as an example, a 1% increase in zinc recovery rate, estimated at current zinc prices, can generate millions of yuan in additional gross profit annually. The quality premium resulting from improved concentrate grade is also considerable. Environmental benefits are quantifiable. Reduced use of toxic reagents directly lowers wastewater treatment difficulties and hazardous waste disposal costs. In some mining areas where the new inhibitors have been applied, environmental tax burdens have decreased, and stricter environmental assessment requirements have been met, clearing obstacles for the long-term legal operation of the mine. The intangible benefits of production stability are also significant. The new inhibitors have broader applicability and stronger buffering capacity against fluctuations in ore properties, helping to reduce fluctuations in production indicators and operational difficulties, thereby reducing the risk of sales discounts or returns due to substandard product quality. 05 Future Frontiers: Limitations of Current Technology and Directions for Future Research Novel environmentally friendly inhibitors are not a panacea. Their research and development cycle is long, and customization requirements are high. A successful reagent formula often only works effectively for specific ore deposit types, and its general applicability needs improvement. High upfront research and testing costs deter some small and medium-sized mines. Currently, the market is flooded with products of varying quality, lacking unified industry standards and performance evaluation systems, making selection difficult for mining companies. The long-term stability in industrial applications, particularly regarding potential impacts on equipment and pipelines, still requires more practical data verification. Future research directions will be more precise and intelligent. Molecular simulation design based on mineral crystal structure and surface properties can achieve "tailor-made" reagents. By combining online analysis systems and automated dosing platforms, real-time dynamic optimization of inhibitor usage is achieved, shifting from "empirical addition" to "perceptive decision-making" intelligent dosing. Another trend is the synergy with other environmentally friendly mineral processing technologies, such as combining with high-efficiency and energy-saving large-scale flotation equipment and tailings dry stacking and comprehensive utilization technologies, to form an overall green mineral processing solution, upgrading from optimization of individual links to overall quality improvement, efficiency enhancement, and emission reduction throughout the entire process. With increasing global ESG requirements for mineral supply chains, "green metals" produced using environmentally friendly reagents may command a market premium. This market pressure from the consumer end is driving mining companies to upgrade their technologies, providing continuous market momentum for the promotion of new inhibitors. In the control room of the mineral processing plant, real-time flotation recovery rate data flashes across the screens. The application of the new inhibitor has made the process curve for lead-zinc separation smoother and more stable. While solving the complex separation challenges of lead-zinc ores, the new environmentally friendly inhibitors are also transforming environmental protection in mining from a "cost burden" to a "value creation" process. Future mining competition will not only be a competition for resource reserves, but also a competition for the ability to convert resources in a green and efficient manner.
What are the main methods of metal mining?
Metal mining methods involve studying the methods of extracting ore from ore bodies.  This includes three main tasks: preparation, cutting, and extraction. The sum of these preparation, cutting, and extraction activities carried out within the ore body to facilitate better ore recovery is called the mining method. Currently, the main mining methods used are: open stope mining, backfill mining, and caving mining. NO.1 Open Stope Mining In open stope mining, the ore body is divided into stopes and pillars during the extraction process. The stopes are mined first, followed by the pillars. The basic conditions for applying open stope mining are that the ore and surrounding rock are stable, and the mined-out area can have a large exposed area for a certain period of time. Widely used mining methods within this category include: full-face mining, room-and-pillar mining, shrinkage stoping, and staged room-and-pillar mining. 01 Full-Face MiningFull-face mining is used in thin and medium-thick, gently dipping (dip angle generally less than 30°) ore bodies where both the ore and surrounding rock are stable. Its characteristics are: the working face advances comprehensively along the strike or dip of the ore body, and during the extraction process, the interbedded waste rock or low-grade ore in the ore body is left behind as irregular pillars to support the mined-out area. These pillars are generally considered a permanent loss and are not recovered.02 Room-and-Pillar MiningUsed for mining horizontal or inclined ore bodies, in which stopes and pillars are arranged alternately in the ore body or mined-out area. When mining the stopes, continuous or discontinuous regular pillars are left to support the roof rock. It has a wider range of application than full-face mining, and can be used to mine not only thin ore bodies but also thick and very thick ore bodies. Stable ore and surrounding rock in horizontal and gently dipping ore bodies are the basic conditions for the application of this mining method.03 Shrinkage StopingWorkers work directly on the pile of broken ore under the exposed face of the stope, extracting the ore in layers from bottom to top. Each time, about 1/3 of the extracted ore is released by gravity, and the rest is temporarily left in the stope as a working platform for continued upward mining. After all the stopes are mined out, the ore temporarily remaining in the stopes is then released in large quantities, which is called mass ore extraction. This mining method is suitable for steeply dipping ore deposits where the ore and surrounding rock are stable, the ore is not prone to spontaneous combustion, and the crushed ore easily re-cements.04 Staged Stope MethodThe ore block is divided into several sections in the vertical direction. Stopes and pillars are arranged horizontally in each section, and the ore mined from the middle section is transported out through the ore extraction roadways of each section. After the stope mining in a section is completed, the pillars in that section can be immediately mined, and the mined-out area can be simultaneously processed.05 Stage Stope MethodThis is an open-stope mining method using deep-hole mining.  Based on the method of ore extraction, it can be divided into horizontal deep-hole stage stope method and vertical deep-hole stage stope method. The former requires undercutting at the bottom of the stope, while the latter, in addition to undercutting, also requires opening a vertical cutting slot along the entire height of the stope. NO.2 Caving Mining Method Caving mining is a mining method that uses caving of the surrounding rock to manage ground pressure. That is, as the ore collapses, the surrounding rock is forcibly (or naturally) caved to fill the mined-out area, thereby controlling and managing ground pressure. It mainly includes single-layer caving method, layered caving method, sectional caving method, and stage caving method.01 Single-Layer Caving MethodThis method is mainly used to mine gently dipping ore seams with unstable roof rock and a thickness generally less than 3m. The ore seam between stages is divided into ore blocks, and the mining work of the ore blocks progresses along the strike of the ore body. After the mining face advances a certain distance, except for the space required for mining operations, the supports are systematically recovered, and the roof of the mined-out area is caved in. The caved roof rock fills the mined-out area to control the roof pressure. According to the form of the working face, it can be divided into longwall caving method, shortwall caving method, and entry caving method.02 Layered Caving MethodThe ore blocks are mined from top to bottom in layers. After the ore in each layer is extracted, the overlying caved rock moves down to fill the mining area. Layered mining is carried out under artificial roof protection, where the artificial roof separates the ore from the caved rock, thus ensuring minimal ore loss and dilution.03 Sublevel Caving Method with Bottom PillarsThis method is also called the sublevel caving method with a bottom structure. Its main features are: firstly, mining is carried out section by section; secondly, a dedicated bottom structure for ore extraction is provided at the bottom of each section, and the section mining is carried out sequentially from top to bottom. It can be further divided into horizontal deep-hole blasting sublevel caving method with bottom pillars and vertical deep-hole blasting sublevel caving method with bottom pillars. 04 Sublevel Caving Method without Bottom PillarsThe bottom of the section does not have a bottom structure composed of dedicated ore extraction roadways.  All operations such as drilling, blasting, and ore extraction are carried out in the mining roadway. 05 Stage Caving MethodThe mining height is equal to the full height of the stage. It can be divided into stage forced caving method and stage natural caving method. The stage forced caving method can be further divided into stage forced caving method with compensation space and continuous mining stage forced caving method. NO.3 Backfilling Mining Method This is a mining method that gradually fills the mined-out area with backfill material as the mining face advances. Sometimes, supports are used in conjunction with backfill material to maintain the mined-out area. The main purpose of backfilling the mined-out area is to use the formed backfill body for ground pressure management to control surrounding rock collapse and surface subsidence, and to create safe and convenient conditions for mining. Sometimes it is also used to prevent internal fires in self-igniting ore. According to the ore block structure and the direction of the mining face advancement, it can be divided into single-layer backfilling mining method, upward layered backfilling mining method, downward layered backfilling mining method, and selective backfilling mining method. According to the different backfill materials and output methods used, it can be divided into dry backfilling mining method, hydraulic backfilling mining method, and cemented backfilling mining method.  01 Single-Layer Backfilling Mining MethodThis method is suitable for gently dipping thin ore bodies.  A wall-type mining face, extending the full length of the ore block, is used to mine the entire thickness of the ore body in one pass along the strike direction. As the working face advances, the mined-out area is systematically backfilled with hydraulic or cemented fill to control the roof.02 Upward Horizontal Layered Backfilling Mining MethodThis method is suitable for gently dipping thin ore bodies. A wall-type mining face, extending the full length of the ore block, is used to mine the entire thickness of the ore body in one pass along the strike direction. As the working face advances, the mined-out area is systematically backfilled with hydraulic or cemented fill to control the roof.03 Upward Inclined Layered Backfilling Mining MethodThe difference between this method and the upward horizontal layered backfilling method is that inclined layers are mined. The transportation of ore and backfill material in the stope mainly relies on gravity. This method can only use dry backfilling.04 Downward Layered Backfilling Mining MethodThis method is used for mining very unstable ore bodies or those where both the ore and surrounding rock are very unstable, and the ore grade is very high or the non-ferrous or rare metal ore body is of very high value. The essence of this mining method is: layered mining and backfilling from top to bottom, with the mining of each layer carried out under the protection of an artificial false roof from the previous layer. The mining layers are horizontal or inclined at an angle of 4°–10° or 10°–15° to the horizontal. Inclined layers are mainly for backfilling the immediate roof, and also facilitate ore transportation, but drilling and support operations are less convenient than in horizontal layers.05 Selective Mining and Backfilling MethodWhen the thickness of the ore vein is less than 0.3–0.4m, miners cannot work in it by only mining the ore.  It is necessary to selectively mine the ore and surrounding rock separately to achieve a minimum working thickness (0.8–0.9m) in the mined-out area. The mined ore is transported out of the stope, while the excavated surrounding rock is used to backfill the mined-out area, creating conditions for continued upward mining. This mining method is called the selective mining and backfilling method. 06 Square-Set Timbering Mining MethodIn the past, thin ore veins were mostly mined using cross-braced or timber-framed support methods.  Under conditions where the ore body is thick, the ore and surrounding rock are extremely unstable, the ore body shape is very complex, and the ore is valuable, this mining method remains an effective one.
Drilling at Canada's Sheridon Gold Mine Shows Potential
According to Mining.com, Dryden Gold has intersected 9 meters grading 2.55 g/t gold at its Sheridon project in Ontario, Canada. The company has also purchased two net smelter returns (NSRs) on the mine. Drilling in Zone Four, hole DSH-25-001, intersected 19 meters of gold at a depth of 40 meters at a grade of 1.28 g/t gold. Drilling in Zone Three intersected 39 meters of gold at a grade of 0.4 g/t gold, and another 7 meters at a grade of 1.82 g/t gold. The Sheridan Gold Mine, part of the company's Gold Rock mineral rights, is located approximately 75 kilometers south of Dryden, Ontario. "While we remain focused on gold rock orebody expansion, our efforts in the Sheridan and Hyndman areas are beginning to confirm the significant potential of Dryden," said Trey Wasser, the company's CEO, in a press release. "I am also pleased to complete the agreement to purchase the Sheridan royalty. Purchasing the royalty at an attractive price will help enhance the mineral rights and shareholder value." Historic Gold Tenures The Dryden landmass is dotted with several older gold mines that have been relatively poorly explored using modern methods. Another notable hole at Sheridan is DSH-25-002, which intersected 136 meters grading 0.26 g/t gold from a depth of 213 meters, including 17.6 meters of mineralization grading 0.6 g/t gold. Hole DSH-25-003 intersected 76.8 meters grading 0.16 g/t gold from a depth of 8.2 meters. 2% NSRs The company reported a 2% return on the Dryden NSRs, purchased from two private parties for C$20,000 on October 3rd. The Dryden NSRs were purchased by the company from Manitou Gold, a subsidiary of Alamos Gold, in March of last year. The remaining royalty on the rights is 1%, payable to Alamos. The Sheridan rights are royalty-free for the remaining rights. The Sheridan deposit is located 35 kilometers south of Gold Rock. The gold mineralization is widespread and controlled by an east-west deformation zone, with a geophysical anomaly extending approximately 5 kilometers. Source: https://geoglobal.mnr.gov.cn/zx/kcykf/ztjz/202510/t20251016_10023265.htm

2025

10/17

The market capitalization of the world's 50 largest mining companies has reached a record high.
According to Mining.com, the combined market capitalization of the world's 50 largest mining companies reached nearly $1.97 trillion by the end of the third quarter, a year-to-date increase of nearly $700 billion, with most of the gains occurring in the third quarter. The total market capitalization of these mining companies has now surpassed the previous record set three years ago. The ranking of the largest mining companies has also shifted during this period. A trend that has persisted in the global mining sector for over a decade has finally broken through mainstream attention: critical minerals have suddenly become a hot topic of discussion for everyone from the US president to taxi drivers. The weak US dollar is the primary reason—the rankings are based on the company's market capitalization in the local currency of its listed exchange, which is then converted to US dollars at the exchange rate. The surge in precious metal prices, including a broad rebound in platinum group metals, is the primary driver. However, despite gains of over 60% for platinum group metals, this was not enough to propel producers back into the top 50. The top performers were mostly gold and silver companies, with Coeur Mining's share price surging an astonishing sixfold thanks to its well-timed acquisition of a Mexican silver mine. Meanwhile, Fresnillo, a London-listed silver company controlled by Mexico's Peñoles, saw its share price surge 305%. In addition to gold and silver, rare earths have also been a strong performer. Perth-based Lynas Rare Earth climbed to 49th place after its share price surged 280%. Las Vegas-based Mountain Pass Materials (MPM) saw its share price surge in the second quarter following a breakthrough agreement with the Pentagon. The company's market capitalization has now increased by 500%. Source: https://geoglobal.mnr.gov.cn/zx/kydt/zhyw/202510/t20251017_10025014.htm

2025

10/17

Australia's Gold Output Reaches 300 Tonnes Again
According to Mining Weekly, data from Melbourne-based consulting firm Surbiton Associates (SA) shows that Australia’s mine gold production for the 2024/25 financial year reached 300 tonnes, hitting a two-year high, though still below the record 328 tonnes achieved in the 1999/2000 financial year.   In the second quarter of 2025, production reached 76 tonnes, a quarter-on-quarter increase of 3 tonnes, or 4%, reflecting steady growth in the industry. At a gold price of A$5,200 per ounce, the annual output value slightly exceeded A$50 billion, making gold Australia’s fourth-largest export commodity, behind iron ore, coal, and liquefied natural gas.   "Australia’s gold mining industry is efficient, highly productive, and critically important," said Dr. Sandra Close, Director of SA. "Gold exports are worth almost half the combined export value of Australia’s agricultural, forestry, and fishery products. Unfortunately, this is poorly understood by many politicians and most of the public."   Global uncertainties, including tensions in the Middle East and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, as well as the radical policies of U.S. President Trump, have continued to drive up the U.S. dollar-denominated gold price. This has led to an even larger increase in the Australian dollar gold price, despite the strength of the Australian dollar.   The practice of blending stockpiled low-grade ore with newly mined ore has somewhat restrained production growth, with this ratio just exceeding 15% in the second quarter. This approach helps extend mine life and optimizes resource utilization.   Foreign control over Australia’s gold mines has varied over time. In 1997, foreign companies controlled 20% of Australia’s gold production, peaking at 70% by the end of 2002. Currently, foreign control stands at approximately 45%. This proportion is expected to rise following the completion of South African Gold Fields’ A$3.7 billion acquisition of Gold Road Resources in late September.   This acquisition involves the Gruyere gold mine, located 200 kilometers east of Laverton, which was discovered by Gold Road in 2013. Gold Fields acquired a 50% stake in the mine in 2016 for A$350 million. Mine construction was completed in 2019 at a cost of A$621 million, with production for the 2024/25 financial year reaching 305,000 ounces. The open pit is expected to reach a depth of at least 500 meters, making it one of Australia’s deepest open-pit mines.   "Although Australian entities control 55% of gold mines overall, their ownership of the top five gold mines in the 2024/25 financial year was only 24%," Close noted. "This truly highlights the dominance of overseas companies over our largest gold producers."   In the 2024/25 financial year, Australia’s top gold mine was Newmont’s Boddington, with production of 574,000 ounces. It was followed by the Tropicana mine (AngloGold Ashanti 70%, Regis Resources 30%) with 466,100 ounces, Newmont’s Cadia mine with 432,000 ounces, Northern Star’s Super Pit with 405,400 ounces, and Newmont’s Tanami mine with 387,000 ounces.   In the second quarter, Boddington remained Australia’s largest gold-producing mine, with output of 147,000 ounces. It was followed by the Super Pit (117,400 ounces), Cadia (104,000 ounces), Gold Fields’ St Ives (99,200 ounces), and Tropicana (93,800 ounces).     Article Source: https://geoglobal.mnr.gov.cn/zx/kydt/zhyw/202509/t20250902_9974529.htm

2025

09/03